Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RE\:\s+Karlquist\s+Proposal\s+for\s+reverse\s+beacons\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RE\:\s+Karlquist\s+Proposal\s+for\s+reverse\s+beacons\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: RE: Karlquist Proposal for reverse beacons (score: 1): Author: "Tod - Idaho" <tao@skypoint.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:05:37 -0500; This sounds like a really good idea. It should be much easier to establish receivers in interesting locations than transmitting stations. One small matter is access to the internet, but I think that; /archives//html/Topband/2003-09/msg00079.html (10,520 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: RE: Karlquist Proposal for reverse beacons (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 20:23:38 -0400; While the concept of a receiver is interesting, many good locations would not be able to participate. The best and least expensive internet connections are in populated areas, right where copy is wor; /archives//html/Topband/2003-09/msg00082.html (10,193 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: RE: Karlquist Proposal for reverse beacons (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 21:04:52 -0700; Not necessarily. You could do a reverse of the NCDXF system whereby the receiver could utilize directional receive antennas with each direction in a preassigned time slot. A series of ten one minute; /archives//html/Topband/2003-09/msg00085.html (9,027 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]