Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Question\s+from\s+a\s+new\s+reflectee\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Question\s+from\s+a\s+new\s+reflectee\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Question from a new reflectee (score: 1): Author: "Mein, Doug" <MEIND@tc.gc.ca>; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:01:08 -0500; Dear Reflectee, I have been subscribed to the Top Band Reflector for the last few weeks and really enjoy reading the mail. It is most comforting to see how so readily fellow radio amateurs give up th; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00157.html (10,020 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Question from a new reflectee (score: 1): Author: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:22:21 -0800; "I am thinking about starting with a well-radialled Inverted L for 160M TX, plus a Vertical for 40 and 80M (i.e., Butternut HF2V)." -- The inv-L is a good idea for 160m. Try to get the vertical secti; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00161.html (8,502 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]