Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+QRP\/Poor\s+antenna\s+stations\s+ARRL160\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: QRP/Poor antenna stations ARRL160 (score: 1)
Author: jon jones <n0jk@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:19:42 +0000
While not running QRP, my antenna in the ARRL 160 was loading up the rain gutter on ourone story rental duplex in Lawrence, KS. Maximum height is about 10 feet above ground, a marginalTop Band antena
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00068.html (7,808 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: QRP/Poor antenna stations ARRL160 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Stewart <cwopr@embarqmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:18:51 -0500 (EST)
Jon, Good job with a minimal setup. I worked ten stations using my homebrew 1924 4-coil Meissner osc, using a C-301A tube ('24 vintage) at about 4 watts input (maybe 1.5 out). The antenna was a 160m
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00070.html (8,574 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: QRP/Poor antenna stations ARRL160 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:59:24 -0800
YES! I ran QRP with 5 watts, putting in a total of about 11 hours. I'm 70 miles S of San Francisco, which is about 2,300 miles from NO3M and K8KS. Both of them pulled me out of the noise, with a lot
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00071.html (8,640 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: QRP/Poor antenna stations ARRL160 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:22:57 -0500
While some people do hear much better than they receive all the time in all directions, and are a waste of transmitter power, the issue often involves more than just power levels. Any analysis is fla
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00076.html (8,003 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: QRP/Poor antenna stations ARRL160 (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:19:43 -0700
N6VW reports driving 5 watts into his apartment plumbing against the AC system ground and making a couples dozen QSOs in the 'test. _______________________________________________ Topband reflector -
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00077.html (10,218 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: QRP/Poor antenna stations ARRL160 (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 19:38:39 -0700
Carl, Tree and all the rest I find it fascinating how just about any piece of random metal and low power will yield top band contacts. For the Stew Perry I propose an award for *"lamest antenna*" or
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00094.html (7,828 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: QRP/Poor antenna stations ARRL160 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 20:03:22 -0800 (PST)
Outstanding idea Dave!  Set a minimum number of QSOs/Watt to qualify and the Cuthbert Cup will become a coveted award. ________________________________ From: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com> T
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00096.html (8,875 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: QRP/Poor antenna stations ARRL160 (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 17:14:11 -0500
I made roughly 40-50 sporadic contacts using a 1939 Meissner VFO at 5-6W and a 1934 National FB-XA, didnt even log them. Nothing spectacular since I wasnt interested in staying up past 10PM (-; Anten
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00103.html (11,822 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu