Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Power\s+line\s+noise\s+on\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Power\s+line\s+noise\s+on\s+160\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Power line noise on 160 (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 02:02:59 -0500; I've been working with the local power company on reducing my noise on 160m. They sent an "expert" on the subject with all of his noise sniffing toys. No conclusions yet but want to present a solutio; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00125.html (7,867 bytes)
2. Topband: Power line noise on 160 (score: 1): Author: richard@karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist); Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 14:20:37 +0100; The beads will saturate at an amp or so of current without an air gap. You could try putting tape over the mating surfaces to create an air gap. Another issue is that the impedance of a 1 turn induct; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00132.html (6,850 bytes)
3. Topband: Power line noise on 160 (score: 1): Author: k0rc@pclink.com (k0rc); Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 19:26:04 +0100; Ford, Tell the clown that said "the faulty insulators are very expensive to replace and it's a temporary fix at best" too quit whining. It's part of their cost of doing business. Several other points; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00133.html (7,877 bytes)
4. Topband: Power line noise on 160 (score: 1): Author: k3hx@juno.com (tttt ccccc); Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 22:43:21 +0100; I am now in my second year of trying to get the local power company to make it somewhat less noisy here. May offer the following suggestions: Once your patience has terminated, enlist the aid of the; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00138.html (7,272 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]