Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Power\s+Coupling\s+on\s+160\s+meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Power\s+Coupling\s+on\s+160\s+meters\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Power Coupling on 160 meters (score: 1): Author: bobnm7m@cnw.com (Robert Brown); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:58:48 -0700 (PDT); Friends in Radio Land - The loss in signal intensity on the low-bands, like 160 meters, is due to the fact that electromagnetic waves are elliptically polarized in the ionosphere. Further, there is a; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00078.html (8,469 bytes)
2. Topband: Power Coupling on 160 meters (score: 1): Author: k4iq@worldnet.att.net (John B. Mitchell); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:42:22 +0100; I don't believe in the Vertical/Horizontal hemisphere theory; and I think belief, rather than empiricism, is what it calls for. My "absolute disaster" of a horizontal (inverted vee) at 100 feet took; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00083.html (7,807 bytes)
3. Topband: Power Coupling on 160 meters (score: 1): Author: sebdesn@ecentral.com (S Schieving); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:24:54 -0600; < Sometimes, close-in, IT'S the disaster! _I think the take off angle is everything..During one of the contests this season I was absoultly unable to work a couple of LOUD (30 over)Texas stations usi; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00086.html (7,162 bytes)
4. Topband: Power Coupling on 160 meters (score: 1): Author: K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com (K9AY); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:10:12 -0400; You might be right, Bud, but it's more likely that those Texans were listening in another direction using Beverages or other directional RX antennas and did not hear you calling. I have rarely had t; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00088.html (7,537 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]