Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Polarization\s+of\s+Man\s+Made\s+Noise\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Polarization\s+of\s+Man\s+Made\s+Noise\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Polarization of Man Made Noise? (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 21:24:37 -0800; Hi All, I have been observing an interesting phenomenon at our club station. We have a full size 160 meter dipole at 90 feet, which is for the most part horizontal (there is a slight downward tilt in; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00181.html (9,551 bytes)
2. Topband: Polarization of Man Made Noise? (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:53:20 -0500; You hit the nail on the head Mike. The reasons local noise sources are predominately vertically polarized are because horizontally polarized signals are radiated and received at high angles by most "; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00182.html (9,970 bytes)
3. Topband: Polarization of Man Made Noise? (score: 1): Author: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed); Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:31:53 -0500; W4EF: Mike & topbanders When I lived in the suburbs of Denver a few years ago, I could NOT get any help in S/N using shielded loops or EWEs. I even decided to search the neighborhood for noise source; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00183.html (8,056 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]