Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Pixel\s+Technologies\s+Magnetic\s+RX\s+Loop\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 16:25:05 -0700
The Pixel Technologies PRO-1A Magnetic Receiving Loop was demonstrated at the Visalia DX Convention last month. It's about the same size as a circular or diamond shaped coax loop. It includes a pream
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00006.html (7,545 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 08:54:35 -0700
My reading of Baum's papers is that the so-called Moebius loop has 4 times the output impedance of a single turn loop and 1/4 of the bandwidth of a single turn loop. If the object is to get broadband
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00007.html (7,161 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 12:58:26 -0700
The question is: why a "Moebius" loop? Note 8 is about loops in general, and says nothing about Moebius loops. Virtually any loop design will have nulls broadside to the loop, and even Baum doesn't c
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00008.html (8,330 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Ikin" <andrew.ikin@btopenworld.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:06:07 +0100
Steve WB6RSE wrote on the 8th May. "If you've built your own Mobius receiving loop of tried the commercial product, a report of your experience would be of great interest to the Top Band list." Steve
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00009.html (10,159 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 07:15:39 -0400
The only thing which would make this "better" than the usual mag loop is better balance - but W8JI has shown a single wire loop can be much easier to balance than the coax. Not sure how broad banded
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00010.html (9,938 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 07:12:52 -0400
I notice they repeat the incorrect assertion that these magnetic loops work by being sensitive to the "magnetic field" rather than the electric field and that has been long shown to be false - these
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00011.html (10,486 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Ikin" <andrew.ikin@btopenworld.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 21:31:37 +0100
Pete W2PM wrote on the 9th May, "I notice they repeat the incorrect assertion that these magnetic loops work by being sensitive to the "magnetic field" rather than the electric field and that has bee
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00015.html (8,999 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:27:44 -0400
Andy. Again, it's the laws of physics which apply. The mag loop can only be sensitive go the magnetic field and less so to the E field only if it is very very close to noise source. That's just the w
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00016.html (10,673 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Ikin" <andrew.ikin@btopenworld.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:07:57 +0100
Pete W2PM wrote on the 9th May, "Andy. Again, it's the laws of physics which apply. The mag loop can only be sensitive go the magnetic field and less so to the E field only if it is very very close t
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00017.html (10,753 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 00:50:05 -0700
Yes. To clarify, the magnetic field dominates in the near field of a current source, and the electric field dominates in the near field of a voltage source. In the far field the magnetic and electric
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00018.html (9,823 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:12:31 -0400
I have actually heard several people - some very experienced 160 DX'ers observe that the magnetic loop can null noise without facing the null to it by raising it's height. K2DSY said he found elevati
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00019.html (13,500 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: "n4is" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:40:09 -0400
Hi folks This is a long and interesting thread and I would like to add some of my observations from the last 5 years using loaded loops on 160m in a suburban lot. SOURCE, begins at roughly one-sixth
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00020.html (11,218 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Ikin" <andrew.ikin@btopenworld.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:57:54 +0100
Steve WB6RSE, wrote on May 8, 2011 "If you've built your own Mobius receiving loop of tried the commercial product, a report of your experience would be of great interest to the Top Band list." Steve
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00044.html (9,180 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu