Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Pennant\s+and\s+Equatorial\s+QRN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Pennant\s+and\s+Equatorial\s+QRN\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Pennant and Equatorial QRN (score: 1): Author: s9ss160m@yahoo.com (charles Lewis); Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:43:38 -0800 (PST); First, my thanks to all those who have helped me with advice and materials in relation to flags and pennants. Due to your kind generosity, I have the filters, transformers and terminations I need in; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00231.html (8,575 bytes)
2. Topband: Pennant and Equatorial QRN (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:32:32 +1300; Hi Charles, The flag is only 5 dB better in "gain ", meaning that the signal output will be 5 dB greater. The two are almost identical in directivity, which is the important parameter for noise redu; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00236.html (7,027 bytes)
3. Topband: Pennant and Equatorial QRN (score: 1): Author: w7iuv@arrl.net (Larry Molitor); Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:22:23 +0000; Greg and Charles, On a computer screen, in free space, or out in the country where you don't need them, the flag and pennant are essentially identical in performance. But, like most topband issues, "; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00240.html (7,900 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]