Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Passive\s+Receive\s+Antenna\s+Splitter\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:13:44 -0500
Can anyone point me to a design for a splitter for sharing a Beverage antenna between two receivers? This is for Field Day so these are not optimized Beverages by any means. Just want to allow the 80
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00098.html (8,218 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: K4RO Kirk Pickering <k4ro@k4ro.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:27:55 -0500
I've used a video selector box (for 75 ohm RF, with F connectors) that Radio Shack used to sell. It was a 4-in 2-out matrix, and allowed either of two radios to have any of the 4 available antennas.
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00099.html (8,285 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:33:20 -0400
That should work fine, Gary! You would have around 3 dB loss in a two-way splitter + a SMALL amount of mismatch-loss for the 50-75 ohm mismatch. I would expect that if your radio will work with the b
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00100.html (9,299 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:41:05 -0400
One word of caution, Gary, if the CATV splitter is a transformer type, rather than resistive it may of have enough low-frequency response for 160 m! Check around with RS and your local electronics st
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00101.html (8,841 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:07:39 -0400
I use a couple of old CATV splitters for general purposes around here and can't measure any excess (more than 3 - 4 dB) loss from common to either port. If you want a known good design to build some
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00102.html (8,669 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: <n0tt1@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 03:34:03 +0000
You might find this of interest, the magic-t combiner/splitter: http://www.w8ji.com/combiner_and_splitters.htm 73, Charlie, N0TT _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.c
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00103.html (9,051 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:52:54 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Gary, The most efficient way to share a Beverage among two (or as many as four) bands to use W3LPL bandpass filters. Loss of each filter is in the order of 1.5 dB vs. about 3.5 dB for a typical Ma
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00104.html (9,429 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: Tony Magon <temagon@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:35:12 +1100
Hi This may be of interest http://www.dxing.info/equipment/rolling_your_own_bryant.dx 73 Tony VK2IC On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com> wrote: _________________ Topband R
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00105.html (9,169 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:41:15 -0400
All the TV splitters Ive taken apart are pure autotransformers with poor isolation. A VNA will show them deterioating and doing very little at 160M. It is simple enough to wind transformers for a spl
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00106.html (11,840 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:03:15 -0400
Yeah, that's why I cautioned Gary about using CATV splitters at 160m. Seems that he has enough reserve gain with his Beverage and K3, that he could certainly tolerate the loss of a 50 ohm resistive s
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00107.html (13,142 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:44:15 -0400
Typically the CATV splitters are marked 5-1000 MHz or similar. I've often wondered how much rolloff there was beyond the basic 3-4 dB down at topband. I have a Clifton that I built myself, but have n
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00109.html (10,039 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:29:17 -0400
People also have to be careful with systems. The "resistor on center tap" splits the signal, but runs the ports out-of-phase. This is OK when you need a 180 flip between port, or you don't care about
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00114.html (12,188 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Alex Goldenberg" <kajotus@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:53:01 -0700
Have a look on ebay - rx splitter . http://www.ebay.com/itm/ANTENNA-SPLITTER-COMBINER-RX-HF-1-50-MHz-SO-239-conn ectors-/321217220222?pt=US_Radio_Comm_Antennas&hash=item4aca09ce7e _________________ T
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00118.html (9,174 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:54:44 -0400
Im in the wrong business! Carl KM1H Have a look on ebay - rx splitter . http://www.ebay.com/itm/ANTENNA-SPLITTER-COMBINER-RX-HF-1-50-MHz-SO-239-conn ectors-/321217220222?pt=US_Radio_Comm_Antennas&has
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00120.html (10,066 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: Jose Orellana - EA7BJ <ea7bj@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 21:42:58 +0100
I use this http://f6aoj.ao-journal.com/crbst_136.html _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00123.html (10,862 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu