Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Orientation\s+of\s+a\s+160\s+meter\s+receive\s+loop\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Orientation\s+of\s+a\s+160\s+meter\s+receive\s+loop\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Orientation of a 160 meter receive loop? (score: 1): Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0000; I have a 160 meter rcv loop - kc2tx product - I want to employ this season. I don't have a lot of band noise here in s/w Utah and don't want to bother with a rotor so....can I mount the loop in a hor; /archives//html/Topband/2016-09/msg00145.html (7,075 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Orientation of a 160 meter receive loop? (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:50:15 -0500; A small loop mounted horizontally will be omnidirectional, mostly horizontally polarized and with a null overhead. An omnidirectional antenna isn't usually a very low noise receiving antenna. The gai; /archives//html/Topband/2016-09/msg00146.html (8,160 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Orientation of a 160 meter receive loop? (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:17:29 -0500; I goofed with those gain numbers. Forgot to do the average gain test in EZNEC. The program was making big errors due to too many segments. The real answer is that there is only 2.4 dB less gain for t; /archives//html/Topband/2016-09/msg00147.html (9,221 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Orientation of a 160 meter receive loop? (score: 1): Author: wb6rse1@mac.com; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:52:21 -0700; The main use of the coax loop or any loop for that matter is not gain but low noise directivity. Placing it on a small TV rotator allows for the nully of local noise to help improve the SNR for the d; /archives//html/Topband/2016-09/msg00152.html (8,071 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]