Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Number\s+of\s+radials\s+\-\s+elevated\s+vs\s+grounded\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Number\s+of\s+radials\s+\-\s+elevated\s+vs\s+grounded\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Number of radials - elevated vs grounded (score: 1): Author: k4kyv@hotmail.com (Donald Chester); Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:32:06; Let's take two extreme cases of vertical antennas with ground radials: a quarter wave broadcast band vertical with 120 buried radials, and a VHF ground plane on a pole, with 3 or 4 quarter wave radia; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00111.html (8,343 bytes)
2. Topband: Number of radials - elevated vs grounded (score: 1): Author: n5ia@zia-connection.com (Milt Jensen); Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 02:41:50 +0000; Don. In late 1965 and early 1966 I completed my 160 M version of your VHF groundplane antenna. The insulated base is 1/8 WL above ground level and the insulated radials (connected only to the feedlin; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00113.html (7,498 bytes)
3. Topband: Number of radials - elevated vs grounded (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 05:59:15 -0500; Hi Don, That was a well thought-out post but I'd like to clarify one thing: That depends on how you define "enough" and what else you do at the feedpoint. With only three or four radials, there will; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00133.html (7,710 bytes)
4. Topband: Number of radials - elevated vs grounded (score: 1): Author: k4iq@worldnet.att.net (John B. Mitchell); Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:38:00 +0000; I too have been experimenting with elevated radials at the ridgetop tower here at K4IQ. The ground has too many rocks and old tree stumps and root systems from being cleared five years ago to use in-; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00136.html (10,262 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]