- 1. Re: Topband: Nice QRP QSO (score: 1)
- Author: "lmlangenfeld tds.net" <lmlangenfeld@tds.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:10:57 -0600
- Sure, but the fact is, nobody forces anybody to dig out a QRP caller. A lot of QRP calls undoubtedly get ignored as too weak to bother with. One has to assume that, if the station on the other end r
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00245.html (8,174 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Nice QRP QSO (score: 1)
- Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:43:40 -0500
- Hi All, That sort of logic on the part of some Hams, though no doubt true, just completely escapes me... I liken it to deliberately stepping over a shiny new quarter that one sees lying on a sidewalk
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00247.html (7,867 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Nice QRP QSO (score: 1)
- Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:55:39 -0700
- I go out of my way to work the weak signals simply 'cuz I am a QRP operator and I'm always assuming a weak signal is a QRP station - sometimes, he/she isn't but they still want that QSO just as we do
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00249.html (8,532 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Nice QRP QSO (score: 1)
- Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:59:49 -0500
- But thats a basic part of the Canadian national heritage Eddy (-; Since my wife is a Newfie I figure I can get away with it. Down here some feel it is below their status to stoop for change or dig fo
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00276.html (10,241 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu