Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Need\s+antenna\s+advice\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Need\s+antenna\s+advice\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Need antenna advice (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters W0BTU <mrscience65704@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:07:29 -0800 (PST); Ok, I feel a little foolish asking this question, but I wonder if anyone on the Topband list can offer some suggestions as to why my transmitted signal on 160 might be so weak. I can hear very, VERY; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00112.html (8,177 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Need antenna advice (score: 1): Author: GEORGE WALLNER <gwallner@the-beach.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:39:07 -0500; Mike, Think of all the compromises you have made: 100 watts, only two semi-elevated radials, antenna wire wrapped over a tree, inverted U, perhaps more... Without details it is not possible to pin-p; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00115.html (8,456 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Need antenna advice (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:14:22 -0500; What tugs at my gut most is that you may have placed insulated radials down on the snow , using the dimensions in the links for laying on the ground. The velocity factor of wires laying on the ground; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00118.html (10,453 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Need antenna advice (score: 1): Author: Charlie Young <weeksmgr@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:15:33 -0600; The primary problem could be that 100w is not enough power to fulfill your expectations. Being new to Top Band (Nov 2008), I am a regular reader of this forum but seldom a contributor. A new QTH alo; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00121.html (12,477 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Need antenna advice (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters W0BTU <mrscience65704@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:53:06 -0800 (PST); Hello all, I want to express my deepest appreciation to all on the Topband list for all the advice and suggestions in response to my post. I received so many replies, it is just not possible to reply; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00124.html (8,598 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Need antenna advice (score: 1): Author: wa5pok@peoplepc.com; Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:29:18 -0600; My 160 amp is broke ... well ... fixed but not yet back together. I easily worked the TX4T on 160 last night with 100 watts. My antenna is an inverted "L" with one elevated radial "L" shaped to fit; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00131.html (7,919 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Need antenna advice (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters W0BTU <mrscience65704@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:23:09 -0800 (PST); Hello Guy, Well, I'm quite happy with the inverted-L(/U) transmitting antenna now, after implementing the elevated radial changes you suggested. Just now, I worked my 13th country on 160 CW (Bulgaria; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00184.html (16,132 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Need antenna advice (score: 1): Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:07:22 -0500; "...I think I have the '160 disease'. :-) " ** I should tell you from the outset, Mike, that there is no known cure for the affliction, either--all you can do is cope with it, and try to live an othe; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00186.html (7,954 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]