Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+NE\s+Dipole\s+vs\s+Vertical\s+with\s+Coupling\s+Effects\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+NE\s+Dipole\s+vs\s+Vertical\s+with\s+Coupling\s+Effects\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: NE Dipole vs Vertical with Coupling Effects (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 13:17:34 +0100; Bob supplied coupling loss data for Northeast orientation (below) which I superposed on antenna patterns previously posted. The following agrees fairly well with what I recall observing when I had bo; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00098.html (10,419 bytes)
2. Topband: NE Dipole vs Vertical with Coupling Effects (score: 1): Author: john.w1fv@telocity.com (John Kaufmann); Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 15:05:15 -0700 (PDT); is so close dipoles work I think the consensus in New England is that high horizontals, up 1/2 wave or more, outperform verticals on 80, at least for inland locations. My vertical array (located righ; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00102.html (8,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]