Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+N7QT\s+on\s+\"Increasing\s+the\s+Rate\s+of\s+the\s+JT\s+Modes\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+N7QT\s+on\s+\"Increasing\s+the\s+Rate\s+of\s+the\s+JT\s+Modes\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: N7QT on "Increasing the Rate of the JT Modes" (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 06:53:17 -0400; In the latest ARRL Contest Update, N7QT has a very interesting article on increasing rate with the usually slow JT65 modes, from a max of one QSO every 6 minutes to one every 4 minutes. K7ADD notes a; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00105.html (7,834 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: N7QT on "Increasing the Rate of the JT Modes" (score: 1): Author: Larry <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 08:26:32 -0400; The traditional JT65 QSOs are a bit like watching grass grow. But a couple of DXpeditions have run some JT65 lately. But I have had a number of cases where I called CQ and stations responded with a s; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00107.html (9,845 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: N7QT on "Increasing the Rate of the JT Modes" (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 10:28:05 -0400; Thank you for the link, Tim. As for the second part, I have to read and re-read that again. I have seen multiples stations calling the DX in different places, but I don't think it was as part of this; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00109.html (9,295 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: N7QT on "Increasing the Rate of the JT Modes" (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 10:45:18 -0400; Hi Larry, People are still debating about when to consider a QSO complete. As you mentioned, if you received a report, and sent a report back, the QSO is in theory complete. However, there is no conf; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00112.html (8,715 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]