Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Multiple\s+drops\s+and\s+vertical\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Multiple\s+drops\s+and\s+vertical\s+antennas\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Multiple drops and vertical antennas (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu May 1 16:48:01 2003; I've received a few e-mails on this. The topic of multiple drops comes up over and over again. Some of this is on my web page under radiation resistance and radiation topics. Multiple drops actually; /archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00010.html (8,783 bytes)
2. Topband: Multiple drops and vertical antennas (score: 1): Author: ve3zi at yahoo.com (Roger Parsons); Date: Fri May 2 09:03:00 2003; Tom is of course correct in his analysis of vertical antennas with multiple feeds. It took me a long time to accept this however... I am of the opinion that there is not as much difference between di; /archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00015.html (7,935 bytes)
3. Topband: Multiple drops and vertical antennas (score: 1): Author: i4jmy at iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Fri May 2 14:20:08 2003; This is not surprising, but you have low loss elements. A 3/4 dB means that the overall efficiency of the antenna 1 in respect of the antenna 2 is between 40 and 50%. Considering that your element lo; /archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00019.html (7,416 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]