Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Multi\-Band\s+Inverted\-L\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Multi\-Band\s+Inverted\-L\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Multi-Band Inverted-L? (score: 1): Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (jmaass); Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:15:51 -0500; Thanks to everyone who responded on this issue, both to the List and directly to me. I'll summarize them here,a nd will review them and post a more detailed summary following the ARRL 160M Contest th; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00029.html (10,012 bytes)
2. Topband: Multi-Band Inverted-L? (score: 1): Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (jmaass); Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:41:14 -0500; Having invested a great deal of time installing the radials under my 160m Inv-L, I'm wondering whether it's practical to modify it for use on 80m as well. Current configuration is 45-feet vertical (H; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00204.html (7,708 bytes)
3. Topband: Multi-Band Inverted-L? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 10:41:44 -0500; Hi Jeff, The only catch is the power rating of the trap will be approximately half the rating of what it is in a dipole. That is because current and voltage in your Marconi antenna across and throug; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00211.html (7,852 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]