Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+More\s+160M\s+Receivers\-Mid\s+\$\$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+More\s+160M\s+Receivers\-Mid\s+\$\$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: More 160M Receivers-Mid $$ (score: 1): Author: k2qo@hotmail.com (Mark Adams); Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 09:49:42 EDT; Hi Gang, Here is the challenge. I have read all the posts on the differences in 160M capability between the 1000mp, Omni VI, etc. But my reality is that after I cut the lawn for the last time in Octo; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00004.html (7,488 bytes)
2. Topband: More 160M Receivers-Mid $$ (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 19:48:55 +0200; You can buy a lot of better equipments at low/er price in a second hand market. The choice is wide and nothing substantially changed in last 20 years to push in favour of new transceivers belonging t; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00007.html (6,898 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]