Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Minimum\s+distance\s+of\s+noise\s+generator\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Minimum\s+distance\s+of\s+noise\s+generator\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Minimum distance of noise generator (score: 1): Author: "Ulrich Weiss" <dj2ya@t-online.de>; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:48:04 +0200; hello topbanders, what is the minimum distance (in wavelengths) for reliable (far field) results??? greetings from Germany Uli, DJ2YA ** Ulrich Weiss Am Birkenstrauch 15 D-57334 Bad Laasphe +49-2752-; /archives//html/Topband/2008-08/msg00068.html (7,581 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Minimum distance of noise generator (score: 1): Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:15:41 -0500; Uli and all, The distance must be sufficient so your measuring instrument does not "see" the elements of the array separately. It also must see a single element as one source, since near-field radia; /archives//html/Topband/2008-08/msg00070.html (8,923 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Minimum distance of noise generator (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:43:18 -0700; DJ2YA asks: I am sure there are experts with better opinions than mine - but I have made most of my measurements around 15 or so wavelengths. I have made some as close as 3 wavelengths and feel I got; /archives//html/Topband/2008-08/msg00071.html (7,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]