Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+MFJ\s+power\s+line\s+noise\s+receiver\s+or\s+alternatives\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1)
Author: richard@karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 16:26:26 -0800
I am wondering if anyone has used the MFJ power line noise receiver that came out last year. I don't own any VHF/UHF gear except 2m FM HT's (which are not useful for this, I understand). I need to ge
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00090.html (7,755 bytes)

2. Topband: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 03:41:11 +0000
Funny you should mention that since I just bought a MFJ-852 at the Charlotte Hamfest. Price was $85 before taxes. I've been having some noise problems recently and decided I needed to try one of thes
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00093.html (9,202 bytes)

3. Topband: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1)
Author: k4kyv@hotmail.com (Donald Chester)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:15:54
I bought a Radio Shack portable receiver for the purpose. It is about the size of a Walkman, and covers AM, FM, TV audio and aircraft. The aircraft frequency range is 108 mHz to 132 mHz AM. I have fo
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00094.html (7,747 bytes)

4. Topband: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:13:29 +0000
.... Why wouldn't it be even more cost-effective to buy something like the Icom IC-Q7A dual band handi-talkie, with 78-330 MHz AM receive capability built in? AES advertised this tiny little thing in
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00096.html (8,513 bytes)

5. Topband: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1)
Author: n0tt1@juno.com (n0tt1@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 18:27:32 +0000
/snip/ Hi Rick, I can relate to that!! I have used one of those MFJ devices. As a noise receiver it worked very well, but I found that the telescoping dipole is almost useless for pin pointing noise
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00102.html (9,100 bytes)

6. Topband: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1)
Author: NX4D@mpinet.net (Doug Waller)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:54:58 -0500
noise sniffer: attenuation unit & 3-element beam for 135mHz. The old Radio Shack receiver was no longer available, so I bought the newer model, Jetstream, cat. no. 12-615. Upon testing the unit vs. t
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00107.html (8,348 bytes)

7. Topband: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1)
Author: richard@karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:57:20 +0000
I noticed that HRO has a Yaesu scanner (VR-120) for $129 that covers .5 to 1300 MHz. Although more money than the other solutions, it appears to be the best because you can use any frequency you want
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00117.html (7,660 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu