Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+MFJ\-269\s+thoughts\?\s+Other\s+analyzers\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+MFJ\-269\s+thoughts\?\s+Other\s+analyzers\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: MFJ-269 thoughts? Other analyzers? (score: 1): Author: "Mike & Coreen Smith" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:34:30 -0300; Hello TopBanders. I have an old and tired MFJ-259 (not the B model) and while it's "alright", it is getting long in the tooth. Every time (and I do mean EVERY time) I use it I have to play with the b; /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00131.html (7,639 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: MFJ-269 thoughts? Other analyzers? (score: 1): Author: "Michael St. Angelo" <mstangelo@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:48:16 -0400; Mike, I have a MFJ-269. It's convenient for checking for a low swr but is not accurate for measuring impedances. If you want accuracy or an analyzer that performs better in the presence of strong sig; /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00135.html (9,205 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]