Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+MA160V\s+\-\s+Performance\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+MA160V\s+\-\s+Performance\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: MA160V - Performance? (score: 1): Author: "Javier Lopez" <jlopez@hogaryalgomas.com>; Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:06:50 +0200; Hi, I would like to know if there are some experiencies to share in this forum regarding the performance of the Cuschcraft MA160V Is my understanding that will not outperform a shunt feed tower but i; /archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00004.html (6,535 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: MA160V - Performance? (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 06:30:27 -0400; _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband; /archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00006.html (8,208 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: MA160V - Performance? (score: 1): Author: "George (K8GG) & Marijke Guerin" <gmguerin@voyager.net>; Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:35:43 -0400; Dear Topbanders: Joe, W1JR wrote about the MA160V as follows: -- Original Message -- From: "by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>" <topband-bounces@contesting.com> To: <topband@contesting.com; /archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00009.html (10,694 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: MA160V - Performance? (score: 1): Author: K5uny@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:15:27 EDT; Well the CC 160 meter vertical may be a compromise over any radial system and it may be a compromise to a degree in overall performance, but for some of us its a terrific solution. Especially, if you; /archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00010.html (7,868 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: MA160V - Performance? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 05:39:32 -0400; I fully agree with George. Assuming a vertical .05WL (18 degrees) high the maximum possible current loop radiation resistance for any possible configuration of loading is 1580 times the height in fa; /archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00011.html (9,757 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: MA160V - Performance? (score: 1): Author: Ralph Matheny <mathenyr@marietta.edu>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:05:26 -0400 (EDT); In short--THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH!-- Ralph Matheny K8RYU 207 Gibbons Place Marietta Ohio 45750 _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00012.html (10,526 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]