Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Legality\s+of\s+Circumventing\s+Commercial\s+MaritimeISP\s+Services\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Legality of Circumventing Commercial MaritimeISP Services?? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:55:33 -0400
Is that any different than the traffic nets used on the hambands since the 20's or earlier? They were also accused of circumventing MaBell. If the communications are strictly personal then the emails
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00115.html (10,600 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Legality of Circumventing Commercial MaritimeISP Services?? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 11:52:41 -0400
No! If the e-mails - even personal e-mail - happen many times a day or a week, the *total volume* justifies a commercial service. If someone is sending or receiving a message or two a month, it may
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00116.html (12,083 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Legality of Circumventing Commercial MaritimeISP Services?? (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schonbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:19:42 -0400
The majority of sailboat and powerboat cruising crowd (some call them yachtsmen) are to busy when they are at the helm to do internet. However when they pull into a port or harbor and drop the anchor
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00119.html (14,936 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Legality of Circumventing Commercial MaritimeISP Services?? (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:51:17 -0400
The fact of the matter is in many cases in this country- ham radio "emergency" communications is not much more than a half step above water boy - very much marginalized and often the help thought of
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00122.html (16,461 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu