Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Lack\s+of\s+NA\s+Activity\s+on\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Lack\s+of\s+NA\s+Activity\s+on\s+CW\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 21:02:04 +0100; Apologies that I haven't been very active on Top Band the past couple of months . . . But I have a new YL, and so have been too busy with other things ! However . . . I did come on for a couple of ho; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00112.html (7,834 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:15:24 -0400; Hi Roger Did you look up in the FT8 band? That is where everyone is. Mike va3mw _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00113.html (8,579 bytes)
3. Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 21:28:07 +0100; Well as far as I'm concerned Mike, FT8 would just be my computer having a contact, not me personally . . . so it's not something I would ever be interested in. But if that's the case, it's even more; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00114.html (7,702 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 20:49:44 +0000; Ive been calling CQ almost every morning from the black hole of California. Propagation to EU from here has been very poor this year but the RBN shows Im being heard in JA, Asia and Oceania but I rar; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00115.html (9,032 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 15:55:36 -0500; Some of us CW ops have not lost interest at all. Our advancing age is like a brick wall sometimes. When and if we can, then we will. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Searchable Archives: http; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00116.html (7,318 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:00:02 -0400; You maybe correct Roger. I was just telling you where they all went. :) I often hear .. no one on CW on 160M, but if you then look at the FT8 passband, it looks like 20M. Now, with FT4 coming, we mig; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00117.html (8,670 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 21:07:58 +0000; Hi Mike, I respect that, but Id guess the aging population of Topband Ops only explains a small part of the lack of CW activity. 73, Bob AA6VB Sent from my iPhone On Apr 22, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Mike Wa; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00118.html (8,357 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:23:59 -0500; Hello Topbanders. . . In my opinion the lack of activity centers on a few key issues: 1. There is no denying FT8 has siphoned off a lot of CW activity, easily proven by a quick tune of the band any n; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00119.html (11,530 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: Andreas Junge <andreas@n6nu.org>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:57:10 -0700; Roger, Is your statement that you dont have enough opportunities to rag-chew on 160M? There is plenty of CW activity if/when there is a new DXCC entity to be had like VI9NI. Lots of OPs are calling w; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00120.html (9,714 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: kolson@rcn.com; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 01:20:34 -0400 (EDT); Just as a note , most of the DX operations on 6 meters moved to FT8 because of the short, almost momentary nature of many 6 meter DX openings. But w hen the band supports longer prop ag ation period; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00123.html (10,532 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: Victor Goncharsky via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:23:04 +0300; This is not always the case. I have noticed long openings to Caribbean during last year 6m season with signal levels good enough for reliable CW QSOs but only FT8 portion of the band was alive. Will; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00125.html (13,106 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: Hans Hjelmström <sm6cvx@hjelmstrom.se>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:36:48 +0200; YES SORRY but FT 8 has killed Amateur Radio more or less. Instead there is a computer game going on.Computers picking up signals not even being able to be heard by humans. Real shame. And ARRL allow; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00126.html (14,334 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: Saulius Zalnerauskas <ly5w.sam@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:40:46 +0300; True, agree 1000% better go QRT, than start these games..... Sam LY5W <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00127.html (16,341 bytes)
14. Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:16:30 +0100; I get that many stations only use FT8 these days (out of laziness?) . . . But there are plenty of Top Band DXers (like me) who would never ever use FT8 . . . but many of these people hardly ever come; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00128.html (9,107 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: <lennart.michaelsson@telia.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:25:24 +0200; Roger et al, I was on early this morning and even checked in on ON4KST. Called a few CQ DX on 1826.5 without response so back to bed. Yet I did see quite a few US callsigns on the chat. Perhaps they; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00129.html (9,526 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:17:20 +0000; Let's ponder: FT8 - everyone is on ONE center frequency (passband) and their computer is transmitting every 15 seconds for hours on end, regardless if they are in contact with another computer or not; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00130.html (12,710 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:29:44 +0300; Hi All Victor you need to stop listening to dx via the internet! When will you make an RX antenna? The availability and use of RX antennas is a great pleasure. Here is an example of the antenna Anato; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00131.html (9,727 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: Victor Goncharsky via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 20:32:01 +0300; I wonder if there's a moderator in this forum who can deal with this UY0ZG idiot, who was expelled from Ukrainian Contest Club,Black Sea Contest club, caused problems to the Ukrainian Amateur Radio L; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00135.html (9,634 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 20:57:43 +0300; Thank you all! Many site views. Especially from the USA. == As for Goncharsky, we feel sorry for him. -- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua uy0zg 2019-04-23 14:29: Hi All Victor you need to stop li; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00136.html (10,851 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1): Author: VE6WZ_Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:52:22 -0600; Here are my thoughts on FACT vs FICTION regarding FT-8 and CW on 160m. (These thoughts relate to working DXnot local NA stations) FICTION: "All the DX has moved to FT8 on 160m like it did on 6m". FAC; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00137.html (18,555 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]