- 1. Topband: LINEAR vs TOP LOADING (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill and Liz McHugh" <magoo@isp.ca>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:02:36 -0400
- My first 160M vertical was linear-loaded and it worked fine....or so I thought. The late K6SE did an EZNEC analysis of my antenna vs what I am using now, which is an 80 ft top-loaded (three wires) an
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00085.html (7,283 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: LINEAR vs TOP LOADING (score: 1)
- Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:04:42 -0400
- The linear loaded KLM 40 and 80M yagis never lived up to their hype. OTOH the little Cushcraft 2el 40 with loading coils plus a capacity hat way out on the elements is a proven winner. Ive sold one o
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00088.html (8,230 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: LINEAR vs TOP LOADING (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:33:30 -0700
- Some KLM Yagi owners have changed to high Q loading coils made by W6ANR and have been happy with the results. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB -
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00101.html (7,605 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: LINEAR vs TOP LOADING (score: 1)
- Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:30:43 -0400
- Thats interesting Rick. One of the CC engineers wrote in QEX that high Q coils was not desired on their 40M. I dont remember exact details but it should be available thru the ARRL archives. The autho
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00106.html (8,141 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: LINEAR vs TOP LOADING (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 22:26:44 -0700
- Perhaps the reason was mechanical. At some point depending on the current distribution, an additional improvement in unloaded Q of the loading coil will provide diminishing returns in terms of effici
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00108.html (8,828 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu