Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+K4M\s+on\s+Topband\s+\-\s+Final\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+K4M\s+on\s+Topband\s+\-\s+Final\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: K4M on Topband - Final (score: 1): Author: "G4GED Dave" <radiodave.g4ged@tiscali.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:05:07 -0800; Ilmo OH2BO wrote>>> Sorry Ilmo I have to disagree because you're only focusing on one part of Europe. Yes, much of Northern and Central Europe did have good TB openings into K4M during their evening; /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00258.html (9,794 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: K4M on Topband - Final (score: 1): Author: Garry Shapiro <garry@ni6t.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:34:10 -0700; Several posters have drawn an analogy between K4M and FT5GA, which I believe to be inappropriate. The experienced K4M leadership was aware of the Euro challenge on topband and strove every night to m; /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00278.html (11,692 bytes)
3. Topband: K4M on Topband - Final (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:36:25 -0700 (PDT); K4M has good operators, reasonable antennas, and a reasonable signal... Easy enough to work them, if you have taken care of business on your end... FT5GA did not have propagation... I listened hard; /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00298.html (6,963 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]