Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+K3\s+vs\s+IC7600\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+K3\s+vs\s+IC7600\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: K3 vs IC7600 (score: 1): Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy>; Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:29:39 -0200; Hello, Just to know is someone did a comparison between the Elecraft K3 and IC7600. For what I can found in internet, seems the IC7600 not have two separate receivers. The K3 diversity RX seems to be; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00002.html (6,969 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: K3 vs IC7600 (score: 1): Author: Brendan Minish <ei6iz.brendan@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:10:55 +0000; I had a 7800 (version with the 3KHz roofing filter) here for around 2 years. For nearly a year it was side by side with the K3. Under CW contest conditions the K3 outperformed the 7800 and that's bef; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00028.html (8,341 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: K3 vs IC7600 (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 15:57:20 +0000; Agreed, but just wanted to mention that I routinely use my 160M Beverage for diversity on 20M (K3 preamp on). RF Gain is set a bit higher on subrx/Beverage, but no big deal. 73, Barry N1EU __________; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00029.html (7,421 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: K3 vs IC7600 (score: 1): Author: Art <k6xt@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:09:41 -0700; It does not. Regarding the other posts on this thread (K3 vs 7800 etc) the 7600 performance suffers badly by comparison to the 7800, much less a K3. I used a 7600 guest op in a recent CW contest, and; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00035.html (7,596 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]