Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+JT\-65\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+JT\-65\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: JT-65 (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:47:06 +0000 (UTC); It is totally amazing, I have an S-7 noise level, cannot hear a peep of any kind of audio and I decode signals and make contacts with the ghost stations on 1838.I hope 8-9 DX guys come up so I can fi; /archives//html/Topband/2017-04/msg00069.html (7,232 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: JT-65 (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:37:24 -0500; How about JT-9? It's even more sensitive on 160m than JT-65, and only takes up 1/10 the bandwidth. Here it is in JT's own words: physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html 73, Mike www.w0btu.com __; /archives//html/Topband/2017-04/msg00071.html (7,012 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]