Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Is\s+self\-spotting\s+ALWAYS\s+wrong\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 06:30:59 -0600
Pardon my ignorance, but if there is little or no activity on 160, what harm does spotting one's own "CQ DX" do? I know it's frowned upon, but I have never understood why. I called CQ DX for awhile t
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00299.html (8,172 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 07:42:49 -0500
I agree. Many times when I was at KH6 at the bottom of the cycle, I would self spot on 10 or 12 since the band was supposedly dead and no one was listening. The boys in EU would be very happy and mor
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00300.html (9,113 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: Juha Rantanen <rantalaane@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:45:54 +0200
No one would be harmed. In the spot notes something like " cq dx band open to AS" would be just fine. It's only prohibited in contests. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.conte
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00301.html (8,844 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 06:48:44 -0600
Thanks. And it goes without saying that self-spotting during a contest is a no-no, too. :-) 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00302.html (7,633 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 06:50:48 -0600
Mike, You did "self spot" just by calling CQ, more than 15 times. It's automatic. http://www.reversebeacon.net/dxsd1/dxsd1.php?f=0&c=W0btu&t=dx 73...Stan, K5GO Sent from my iPad _________________ Top
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00303.html (8,927 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 07:52:34 -0500
Hello Mike, Just a comment - the Reverse Beacon Network reported many W0BTU spots this morning from the Skimmer receivers. Anyone watching the RBN knew you were calling CQ. I also heard you FB this A
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00304.html (8,878 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: Greg Zenger <n2gz@gregzenger.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:08:49 -0500
I don't have a problem at all with self spotting, regardless of band, time or mode. However, if you do self spot, you owe it to the community to stick around for 15 mins or so, on or near that freque
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00305.html (11,234 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:22:02 -0500
I mostly rely on reversebeacon skimmers to "spot me". I know for sure whenever I issue a CQ, and I'm not specifically in a contest unassisted, I am also watching reversebeacon. If I call CQ on 160M a
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00306.html (10,421 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:55:32 -0500
Contest its a no no and we all know that and it usually in the rules. But I am not a power station or a highly wanted call unless you want to work me because I am 5 miles from downtown Hell Michigan.
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00310.html (12,270 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:38:00 -0500
I don't think it's wrong, it says you're QRV & here's where to find me. Sounds good to me. 73, Gary KA1J -- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00318.html (8,115 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 17:59:39 -0500
I agree, Gary. Over the years I've seem a number of DX stations do that - especially on quiet bands or if they have more modest stations, or are in really far-away places. It's never bothered me and
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00319.html (9,568 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 08:22:57 -0600
Thanks for all the replies! The RBN is a good idea, and I use it occasionally. But I don't think everyone uses it. For one thing, it takes more CPU power, RAM, and bandwidth than what everyone has. I
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00330.html (8,776 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:10:36 -0800
It's easy to get RBN spots. Simply use VE7CC's cluster program, and connect to his cluster. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00333.html (9,179 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu