Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+Lengths\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+Lengths\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted L Lengths (score: 1): Author: "Doug Turnbull" <turnbull@net1.ie>; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:28:30 -0800; Dear OMs, I note that some use inverted L antennas of 160 feet plus in length and others like myself have them closer to a quarter wave length at 132 feet or so. My antenna runs nearly 100 feet in th; /archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00090.html (8,143 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Inverted L Lengths (score: 1): Author: "GeorgeWallner" <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:11:23 -0500; Doug, You had a great signal here in Miami the other night, so I think your antenna works well (enough). So don't rush out to lengthen your inverted L just yet :-)... But...some believe that a longer; /archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00093.html (7,997 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]