Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+ELL\s+for\s+160M\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+ELL\s+for\s+160M\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted ELL for 160M (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 21:32:14 -0500; I've been wanting to try top band for a long time, and after scouring the books on my shelf and a few internet sources, here's what I've come up with (tentative) that will fit on my lot: The vertical; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00009.html (8,418 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Inverted ELL for 160M (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:02:07 -0500; Jerry: My Inverted L was ground-mounted, so I can't offer much in the way of help for your elevated radial design. However, based on my experience with my tree-supported L, I can offer this. If possi; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00012.html (10,798 bytes)
3. Topband: Inverted ELL for 160M (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:09:13 -0500; Many thanks to those who responded to my question with some good comments and ideas. Almost everyone said I should use radials on the ground rather than elevated, but I think I have to stick with the; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00027.html (8,268 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Inverted ELL for 160M (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:26:08 -0400; Jerry Keller wrote: Last, I have a spool of RG59/U CATV coax with stranded center conductor and double shield.....tinned braid plus a foil under the braid that seems like it's glued onto the soft whi; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00033.html (8,357 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]