Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+\"L\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+\"L\"\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted "L" (score: 1): Author: geoff.cottrell@virgin.net (Geoff Cottrell); Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:13:54 +0100; I have just put up an Inverted "L" ant for topband (+ higher) and am trying to decide how long the top loading wire should be for best dx performance. At present the "vertical" section is 50 feet (sl; /archives//html/Topband/2001-04/msg00081.html (8,145 bytes)
2. Topband: Inverted "L" (score: 1): Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:41:42 -0400; Hello Geoff, I, personally, would reduce the top section to better resonate the total wire length. What you have is a 1/4 wavelength wire horizontal at a low angle, so most of the energy will go up,; /archives//html/Topband/2001-04/msg00083.html (7,586 bytes)
3. Topband: Inverted "L" (score: 1): Author: herbs@vitelcom.net (Herbert Schoenbohm); Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:46:21 -0300; Geoff, Another means of reducing the unwanted radiation from the top section and still getting the top loading you require for a reasonable impedance at the base is to reduce the flattop portion to 1; /archives//html/Topband/2001-04/msg00084.html (8,012 bytes)
4. Topband: Inverted "L" (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 19:37:54 -0400; I'm giving a talk at Dayton on Friday in the antenna forum on traps. I've spent some spare time in the past several months building and measuring traps...and testing traps other people have sent me.; /archives//html/Topband/2001-04/msg00085.html (8,091 bytes)
5. Topband: Inverted "L" (score: 1): Author: Jim Murray <adkmurray@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 16:16:50 -0700 (PDT); Hello All! Just finished getting up my first inverted L and a start on the radial system (have a new found respect for those with many radials). I managed to get the vertical portion over the top of; /archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00060.html (7,683 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Inverted "L" (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:07:22 -0700; You're only giving us resistance readings, not reactance. That makes it tough to guess what's going on. The MFJ 259 gives both R and X. A inverted L like yours would have a resistance of 20-30 ohms a; /archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00061.html (7,795 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]