Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\-L\s+Summary\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\-L\s+Summary\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted-L Summary (score: 1): Author: Chuck Sudds <chuck@dxham.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:23:24 -0600; I was asked by several people to post a summary of the information I received concerning my upcoming Inverted-L project, so here goes: The more radials, the better BUT even one (or a few) are better; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00152.html (8,738 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Inverted-L Summary (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 09:34:32 -0500; <<Seal the end(s) of any coaxial capacitors used and tie and coil them up. Do not just lay them out on the ground. (I have NO idea how to "estimate" the capacitance of a variable capacitor!! Guess I; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00155.html (8,794 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Inverted-L Summary (score: 1): Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:53:10 +0100; 10 pieces in parallel, each one 3.3ft long, will better approximate a capacitor than a 33ft long single run of coaxial cable, at least at 2Mhz. All shields togheter, one side, all inners togheter the; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00160.html (8,180 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]