Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\-L\s+Bazooka\s+type\s+antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\-L\s+Bazooka\s+type\s+antenna\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted-L Bazooka type antenna (score: 1): Author: "Charles Otnott" <OtnottC@gchidta.org>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:33:04 -0600; Greetings all, I have heard about an Inverted-L Bazooka type antenna that is a 1/4 wave long. It is supposed to be lower in noise than the true inverted-l. If anyone has any diagrams/photos/web sites; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00169.html (6,560 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Inverted-L Bazooka type antenna (score: 1): Author: "Herbert Schoenbohm" <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:02:40 -0400; Charlie, WD5BJT asks: I have heard about an Inverted-L Bazooka type antenna that is a 1/4 wave long. It is supposed to be lower in noise than the true inverted-l. IMHO there is little to gain, and no; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00176.html (7,758 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]