Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inv\s+L\s+Config\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inv\s+L\s+Config\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inv L Config (score: 1): Author: Jerry Keller <k3bz@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 23:37:37 -0500; Is it advantageous to make both the vertical and the horizontal sections "fat" (for improved bandwidth), or is it enough to "fatten" the vertical (radiating) section ? How much BW will 3" diameter sp; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00083.html (6,422 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Inv L Config (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 00:05:37 -0500; The horizontal section also radiates, more or less than the vertical depends on the specifics. Easy to see in a very simple NEC model. If you are opposed to radiation from the horizontal on principle; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00084.html (8,471 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Inv L Config (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 22:24:54 -0700; I had plenty of bandwidth with my L. Maybe that means I have plenty of loss too. :( I had no issues working nearly everyone I heard. I wonder what making a "cage" on the vertical section would do. So; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00085.html (7,699 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Inv L Config (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 00:28:23 -0500 (EST); A very important caution about the performance of T-verticals vs. Inverted-L verticals. If the performance of your 40 meter antennas is important to you and your T-vertical is within 300 feet of your; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00086.html (9,521 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Inv L Config (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 23:38:31 -0700; I just went over the RBN data for W0MU spots on Dec 3 and Dec 4. Dec 3rd I had a top loaded Cushcraft MA-160. Dec 4th Inverted L about 50ft vertical and the end pointing northish and going up toward; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00090.html (8,172 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Inv L Config (score: 1): Author: Charles Shaw <chasshaw@leaco.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:05:40 +0000; About 16 years ago I modified an ordinary inverted L (with c60 feet vertical) using 4 vertical #14 wires spaced in a one-foot square--hoping to broaden the TX band width. No sign of improved bandwidt; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00095.html (8,459 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Inv L Config (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:34:32 +0000; My base insulated tower is 127' of Rohn 25G. An 80m half-wave dipole is attached at the 119' level, the ends of which droop down to about 100' at each end, with runs of Phillystran from the ends of t; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00151.html (13,874 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]