Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Interference\s+on\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Interference\s+on\s+160\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Interference on 160 (score: 1): Author: John Harden <jhdmd@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:04:49 -0500; It has been my pleasure to have been a ham and DXer since 1959 at age 15. There was a lot of howling going on even back then. Once Buck Joyner (SK about 1970) was on AM. Someone told him he was "wide; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00230.html (7,857 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Interference on 160 (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:35:29 -0600; Great if you can do it. But on the flip side it condones and encourages bad behaviour which may be part of the problem. In any sport there is a referee who catches and penalizes bad behaviour. Otherw; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00232.html (7,475 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Interference on 160 (score: 1): Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:22:38 -0500; This phenomenon not a new one. with the advent of DX clusters and Telnet spotting networks. IMHO has heightened the blind calling practice.I do believe there should be some decorum especially on the; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00242.html (9,599 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]