Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+In\s+L\s+in\s+Tree\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+In\s+L\s+in\s+Tree\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: In L in Tree (score: 1): Author: "JC" <n4is@n4is.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:19:01 -0400; Hi Ed One of most impressive study about Tree and antenna performance was presented few month ago by Dr. Kay Siwiak, KE4PT during the South Florida DX association. The study was based on years or res; /archives//html/Topband/2018-09/msg00178.html (7,521 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: In L in Tree (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 17:01:13 -0400; Gents: My favorite aphorism on the subject of theory vs practice is thus: The difference between theory and practice in theory is less than the difference between theory and practice in practice. 73; /archives//html/Topband/2018-09/msg00180.html (8,343 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: In L in Tree (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 19:57:18 -0500; Jose (et al), I respectfully and strongly disagree that this QST article applies to 160m to the degree described in that PDF (which does not even mention 160 meters!). I DO agree with the findings in; /archives//html/Topband/2018-10/msg00006.html (9,704 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: In L in Tree (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 20:31:39 -0400; I sometimes get around to posting on these things only when I'm not buried by something else. So late as this may be... I'm sure that the writer truly meant "worked very well", but that is not a scal; /archives//html/Topband/2018-10/msg00130.html (15,757 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]