Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ICEPAC\s+\&\s+PROPLAB\s+PRO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ICEPAC\s+\&\s+PROPLAB\s+PRO\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ICEPAC & PROPLAB PRO (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@earthlink.net (KN4LF, Thomas Giella); Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 12:42:47 +0000; Carl K9LA is certainly correct, ICEPAC does not give correct results for 160 meters. Unfortunately neither does PROPLAB PRO, though it is better software then nothing. 73, Thomas Giella, KN4LF; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00059.html (6,499 bytes)
2. Topband: ICEPAC & PROPLAB PRO (score: 1): Author: frenaye@pcnet.com (Tom Frenaye); Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 14:19:41 -0500; Could you explain that in a little more detail? For example, how do you know the results are wrong? Are the angles reported too high or too low? Thanks! -- Tom -- e-mail: frenaye@pcnet.com YCCC --> h; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00064.html (7,115 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]