Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ICE\s+196\s+Receiver\s+Protector\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ICE\s+196\s+Receiver\s+Protector\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ICE 196 Receiver Protector (score: 1): Author: "Scott Long" <k8sm@windstream.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:31:08 -0400; Excuse me if this has been asked. I was wondering if anyone on here has ever used or is currently using the ICE 196 Receiver Protector? What's your opinion? Thanks, Scott, K8SM ______________________; /archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00020.html (6,256 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: ICE 196 Receiver Protector (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:44:33 -0400; I have been using them for some time. I suspect they protect receivers OK. I did have to put a bandpass filter ahead of mine. On nights with very good propagation I found my noise floor would rise,; /archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00021.html (7,629 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: ICE 196 Receiver Protector (score: 1): Author: "Charles W. Shaw" <chasshaw@leaco.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:37:23 +0000; Hi Scott, I have been using the ICE 196 for about five years. I was having problems with my Orion doing strange things (such as shutting down0 because some of my Beverages are under my 80 and 40 mete; /archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00022.html (7,652 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]