Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+I\s+need\s+a\s+good\s+idea\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+I\s+need\s+a\s+good\s+idea\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: I need a good idea... (score: 1): Author: <armin.ficza@nokia.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:51:27 +1300; I am still not QRV on 160m. Previously, I got a many response from you, and had a conclusion, that for my QTH, lazy H is the best option. I am a bit afraid to erect a new antenna becouse of the counc; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00153.html (7,887 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: I need a good idea... (score: 1): Author: Telegrapher9@aol.com; Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:29:19 EST; Armin, there are many ways to proceed. Here is one way to do it that is simple. A simulation of a 60' vertical with twelve 70' radial wires, 12' above the ground, shows that it wil resonate with 64 u; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00160.html (7,343 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]