Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Hygain\s+hytower\s+on\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Hygain\s+hytower\s+on\s+160\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Hygain hytower on 160 (score: 1): Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 22:10:28 -0400; Seems like the base loading coil lc-160q is about worthless, especially with greater than 100 watts....anyone have direct experience with the other option , loading wire from near the top.....any oth; /archives//html/Topband/2021-05/msg00022.html (6,370 bytes)
2. Topband: Hygain hytower on 160 (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 05:11:57 -0500; No personal experience but I've heard repeatedly over the years that the inverted L kit works way better than the loading coil. This makes sense. I think the inverted L kit consists of a trap you han; /archives//html/Topband/2021-05/msg00023.html (6,658 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Hygain hytower on 160 (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 06:17:30 -0700; Another change to relate this story - used a unmodified hytower with about 500W and after an hour - we noticed the insulator was on fire. I have heard of people getting a better insulator and perhaps; /archives//html/Topband/2021-05/msg00024.html (7,618 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Hygain hytower on 160 (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 10:57:15 -0400; I havent run a model on a hytower recently but helped one soul out of a quandary with one a while back. Items that required attention: 1) Coax connection SO239 at base and its mounting device metal,; /archives//html/Topband/2021-05/msg00025.html (9,783 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]