Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+How\s+were\s+CQWWDX\-CW\s+Test\s+cndx\s+on\s+TB\s+at\s+YOUR\s+QTH\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: How were CQWWDX-CW Test cndx on TB at YOUR QTH? (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:29:35 +0000
Id give it a 6.5. Europe was plentiful on FRI night, but with just fair sigs. SA-CA-Carib fair. I tried very hard to work a loud LU8 with no success! No Asia. No Pacific. No Africa. Thank you KL7RA!
/archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00092.html (11,692 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: How were CQWWDX-CW Test cndx on TB at YOUR QTH? (score: 1)
Author: w5zn@w5zn.org
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:44:44 -0700
I operated SOSB 160 from my station in Arkansas. I found Friday evening condx marginal and no EU peak at their SR. Saturday evening was much different. Sigs from EU were gud with a nice peak during E
/archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00093.html (7,831 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: How were CQWWDX-CW Test cndx on TB at YOUR QTH? (score: 1)
Author: List Mail <mail10@barefoothorse.com.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:33:02 +1100
Terrible. I couldnt even raise K3LR who had a reasonable signal on the first night, and who actually requested I call them on 160 m the second night after our QSO on 80 m. I can usually work K3LR eas
/archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00094.html (7,474 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: How were CQWWDX-CW Test cndx on TB at YOUR QTH? (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 17:02:18 -0700
From the peanut whistle on the west side of the country just three of the usual suspects, JA3YBK, RM0F and HL5IVL on Saturday, somewhat after local sunrise.  I totally slept in on Sunday.  Nighttime
/archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00096.html (7,204 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: How were CQWWDX-CW Test cndx on TB at YOUR QTH? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Stewart via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:48:19 -0500 (EST)
From another peanut whistle from the east coast: Fri night most EU stns were weak and marginal for me even to try...but did any way. Sat night abt the same altho a few had a fair sig...a good bit of
/archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00097.html (9,601 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: How were CQWWDX-CW Test cndx on TB at YOUR QTH? (score: 1)
Author: K4RO Kirk Pickering <k4ro@k4ro.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:20:38 -0600
Thank you very much for trying Luke. I was the 80m op who requested that you try to work K3LR on 160m. Unfortunately, we were not able to complete any 160m QSOs with VK this year. 73, --Kirk K4RO On
/archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00098.html (8,144 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu