Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Hindering\s+factors\s+in\s+the\s+science\s+of\s+back\s+yard\s+160m\s+vertical\s+ins\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Hindering\s+factors\s+in\s+the\s+science\s+of\s+back\s+yard\s+160m\s+vertical\s+ins\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Hindering factors in the science of back yard 160m vertical ins (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 04:41:34 -0600; That isn't exactly correct, Guy. The 1937 real-world experiments of Brown, Lewis & Epstein of RCA Labs includes measured data for sets of of radials varying in number from 2 to 113, and in length fro; /archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00021.html (10,489 bytes)
2. Topband: Hindering factors in the science of back yard 160m vertical ins (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:29:40 -0600; ________________ The complete data/paper from BL&E is available as item 4 at http://rfry.org/Software%20&%20Misc%20Papers.htm _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QS; /archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00027.html (7,874 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Hindering factors in the science of back yard 160m vertical ins (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:12:59 -0500; I'll have to counter that the two radial figures in your quoted RCA study are not about defining what goes wrong with minimalist and miscellaneous downward extrapolation of dense and uniform radial s; /archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00031.html (21,295 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]