Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Hi\-Pass\s+filter\s+for\s+160\s+to\s+reject\s+BC\s+Band\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Hi\-Pass\s+filter\s+for\s+160\s+to\s+reject\s+BC\s+Band\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Hi-Pass filter for 160 to reject BC Band (score: 1): Author: k8gg@voyager.net; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 11:17:06 -0500 (EST); Fellow Topbanders: Another Hi-Pass filter is shown in the 1986 ARRL Handbook on page 30-24. It is also shown in other ARRL Handbooks. The original article was published in QST in Feb 1978 and was w; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00120.html (7,725 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Hi-Pass filter for 160 to reject BC Band (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 11:33:39 -0500; Hi George, I'm curious as to how the results might compare, if one were to simply place a series-connected coil & capacitor wave trap (resonant to the BC station's frequency, of course) to ground at; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00121.html (7,686 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Hi-Pass filter for 160 to reject BC Band (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 16:16:44 -0600; I have a Kiwa Electronics Broadcast Band Rejection filter for sale. http://kiwa.com/ Email me directly for a price. Doug _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00129.html (6,973 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Hi-Pass filter for 160 to reject BC Band (score: 1): Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 08:36:52 -0800 (PST); Hi Eddy You are correct, but obviously this is not the best approach for multiple broadcast stations. When I first built my remote station there was a high power AM station with an 8 element array be; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00136.html (8,754 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]