Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Ground\s+loss\s+query\s+$re\s+inverted\s+L\,\s+antenna\s+radiation\s+resistance\,\s+\&\s+Jerry\s+Sevick$\,\s+Part\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Ground\s+loss\s+query\s+$re\s+inverted\s+L\,\s+antenna\s+radiation\s+resistance\,\s+\&\s+Jerry\s+Sevick$\,\s+Part\s+II\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Ground loss query (re inverted L, antenna radiation resistance, & Jerry Sevick), Part II (score: 1): Author: wyc <wycpublic@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:46:11 -0700; Several folks responded to my original post, suggesting that I should view the folded inverted-L construction as a single wire construction fed with a 4:1 transformer. Looking at the system through s; /archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00163.html (10,561 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Ground loss query (re inverted L, antenna radiation resistance, & Jerry Sevick), Part II (score: 1): Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:46:06 -0400; The radiation resistance over soil is different than the radiation resistance over perfect earth. The radiation resistance depends on the number, length, and type of radials too: http://www.antennas; /archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00166.html (8,454 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]