Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+General\s+Conditions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+General\s+Conditions\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: General Conditions (score: 1): Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:23:08 -0500; Good Day All, I thought that the seemingly continuous stretch of poor conditions on the band this year were a product of my imagination & impatience...until I took a look at my log book for this same; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00140.html (7,291 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: General Conditions (score: 1): Author: Hardy Landskov <n7rt@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:12:28 -0700; band this year were a product of my imagination & impatience...until I took a look at my log book for this same time period from a short year ago. November when I would easily work a half dozen, & mo; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00144.html (8,090 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: General Conditions (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:09:48 -0500; Topband conditions during this sunspot minimum are nothing like they were during the 1995-1996 minimum. However, it's easy to look at the daily solar flux numbers and see why... Either we have a way; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00145.html (8,728 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: General Conditions (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:34:20 -0800; QSOs in the log so far - each on different nights during very short openings (DF2PY, SV3RF and UT3MD). I am sorry to hear that SM and OH have fallen into the ocean. Conditions in October were MUCH b; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00146.html (7,096 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]