- 1. Topband: Fwd: Re: Fw: "Outing the Scofflaws" - Getting Old (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy (K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:48:53 -0600
- On 11/12/2012 3:02 PM, Dave Heil wrote: > Nor do they hurt anything. W3LPL's spots don't cause deliberate QRM > to any DXpedition. If you don't like them, feel free to make your > case directly to Fr
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00151.html (6,981 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Fwd: Re: Fw: "Outing the Scofflaws" - Getting Old (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:51:03 -0800
- I don't understand the objection to W3LPL spots. As I understand it, Frank is aggregating spots from a lot of skimmers and weeding out the bad one -- blown callsigns, flaky frequencies) and posting o
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00162.html (8,082 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Fwd: Re: Fw: "Outing the Scofflaws" - Getting Old (score: 1)
- Author: Gary and Kathleen Pearse <pearse@gci.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:00:18 -0900
- I don't use a PC in the shack out of choice. Spots don't exist. I tune around and work what I hear. W3LPL helps those that use that service. 73, Gary NL7Y ____________________________________________
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00163.html (7,404 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu