Author: k1zm--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 10:42:32 +0000 (UTC)
Hmmm again Okay - now I remember this guy and his shenanigans from way back. OK1RD (now masquerading as OK1YQ - which is a callsign that does not appear on qrz.com!) Guys - I would recommend that an
Author: k1zm--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 10:47:40 +0000 (UTC)
FYI There is a NEW EMAIL ADDRESS for the ARRL DXCC DESK - it is DXCCAdmin@arrl.org Good idea Jeff! Thanks Peter for digging in this mudd! 73 Len/BIC Hmmm again Okay - now I remember this guy and his
Hi Jeff We have a similar problem with several "PY" faking QSL, QSO and even LOTW confirmation by the DX operator. We've been reporting (we.. N4IS, PY2XB , PY2RO and PY5EG), documenting on paper, tal
Author: k1zm--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 15:59:08 +0000 (UTC)
Time to take action on this one please.... Thanks to all who find the time to do so. 73 JEFF JC and other 160m ops PLEASE DO write to the ARRL DXCCDESK to complain about this OK1YQ matter - this guy
Hmmm again Okay - now I remember this guy and his shenanigans from way back. OK1RD (now masquerading as OK1YQ - which is a callsign that does not appear on qrz.com!) Guys - I would recommend that any
Hmmm, That fact is that there isn't much [Topband] expertise left in Newington. I asked a casual question a month or so ago about OK1RD, etc., and was assured that an investigation was conducted. How
That fact is that there isn't much [Topband] expertise left in Newington. I asked a casual question a month or so ago about OK1RD, etc., and was assured that an investigation was conducted. I asked y
Several months ago I was asked by the League for a segment of one of my DX-pedition logs. I assume it was for this, but I don't know that for a fact. Times are changing. There are more ways than ever
It does seem, at the moment not being entirely wrapped up in ham radio, that there certainly is the analogue of OK1YQ in just about every realm of life. I can think of a few names that I personally f
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 04:17:20 -0300
Would not a 100% LOTW be the ultimate answer to card frauds? There is, in fact, is no card checker in the VI for 160 meter QSO's causing me countless mailings to the DXCC desk. This all could be avoi
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:40:24 -0300
I concur. I wonder if someone could adopt their logs post operation and provide LOTW as a surrogate? Also, the stations who require green stamps could learn the OQRS procedure and probably net more i
Hi Topbanders Guy K2AV - Lots of philosophy ... ARRL has a program: http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20190624-A4.pdf#page=1&zoom=auto,-12,848 ARRL is obliged to protect this program! Bu
Author: "Lee. KX4TT via Topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:25:25 -0400
GM Herb, The DXCC Card Checkers do not have to have 160m DXCC anymore........................but they do have to allow their work to be vetted by HQ. Some field checkers may be unaware of this change