Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fw\:\s+Re\:\s+\:\s+antenna\s+question\s+\.\.\.this\s+is\s+not\s+going\s+to\s+dieqiuite\s+yet\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fw\:\s+Re\:\s+\:\s+antenna\s+question\s+\.\.\.this\s+is\s+not\s+going\s+to\s+dieqiuite\s+yet\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Fw: Re: : antenna question ...this is not going to dieqiuite yet.................... (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:27:03 -0500; This may improve the SWR somewhat in a 300 ohm system, but if you are using a tuner to match 50 ohms to 300 ohms, then you won't seem any noticable improvement. (The tuner setting will compensate for; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00292.html (9,788 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Fw: Re: : antenna question ...this is not going to dieqiuite yet.................... (score: 1): Author: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:50:26 -0600; Mike-- Often, quoting eHam is repeating nonsense. Sorry, but it is so, and this is a good example. Any Ham that relies on published Velocity factor data, without verification, gets errors, and (frequ; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00294.html (9,998 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]