Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Forbidden\s+Frequency\s+Part\s+2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Forbidden\s+Frequency\s+Part\s+2\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Forbidden Frequency Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:53:33 -0600; Hi, All Thanks for all the useful and informative answers to my recent post/question about the QRM on 1830khz. Perhaps, though, I should have refined my original question somewhat. I am well aware th; /archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00042.html (7,729 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Forbidden Frequency Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 20:26:59 -0500; my post was "why locations?" .....because quite a few DX stations work 1830 CW. It's often the center of DX activity, and for some odd reason once in a while DX stations (some pretty rare) like to o; /archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00045.html (7,836 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Forbidden Frequency Part 2 (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <rimradio@direcway.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:22:18 -0700; I mean, sure, a unique combination of mixer products, beat notes, harmonics, etc. could conspire to make 1830khz a particularly "bad" frequency at MY QTH, but why then is it also such a bad frequency; /archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00049.html (7,719 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]